Good. But it's not just that the models and papers were bad. The case definition itself was so bad they removed symptoms from it in 2023, then acted like nothing happened. This means all covid actions and products are invalid at a very fundamental level, and always were. All papers, policies, and products relying on case counts must be withdrawn immediately in full.
It’s very necessary to deny vaccine injury for fear of encouraging vaccine-hesitancy which will put a dampener on OTT profits. Pharma invests in vaccine-hesitancy research in both academic & private research facilities worldwide in order to increase buy-in/loyalty to the vaccine cult.
I usually struggle to read the substacks of researchers, but Lataster was very (non-science-based) reader-friendly. All the anomalies on one hand makes you want to laugh, but on the other hand makes you want to cry.
Good. But it's not just that the models and papers were bad. The case definition itself was so bad they removed symptoms from it in 2023, then acted like nothing happened. This means all covid actions and products are invalid at a very fundamental level, and always were. All papers, policies, and products relying on case counts must be withdrawn immediately in full.
It is also interesting how the people involved never speak of vaccine injury that results in serious harm or death.
It’s very necessary to deny vaccine injury for fear of encouraging vaccine-hesitancy which will put a dampener on OTT profits. Pharma invests in vaccine-hesitancy research in both academic & private research facilities worldwide in order to increase buy-in/loyalty to the vaccine cult.
for anyone interested, here are about ~750 studies that say otherwise lol https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/they-dont-want-the-science?r=8ypo0
I usually struggle to read the substacks of researchers, but Lataster was very (non-science-based) reader-friendly. All the anomalies on one hand makes you want to laugh, but on the other hand makes you want to cry.