I refused the jab and knowing I would be thrown out of work, a board member of a major and now notorious hospital invited me to their house for coffee, hoping to convince me to agree to the jab. This board member exhorted that it was incredibly safe and that even their adult daughter and daughter in law had gotten the COVID jabs while pregnant, at their urging.
The board member grew quite frustrated that I couldn't be convinced. I never heard how it went for the daughters. I did know couples who were jabbed who successfully conceived and brought babies into the world. One colleague proudly told me they had gotten their 6 mo old son the COVID injections. I wondered, if a baby in the womb is already born with spike protein in their system, what sense does it make to inject a baby with more mRNA to incite even more spike production? How is it that infants aren't dying left and right? And how will the generation of COVID jabbed babies fare in life as they get older?
In my own experience, a young couple I know got married and got the shots in the same year, the next year their baby daughter was born with half an arm missing and no legs. The doctors are baffled because she has no genetic defect, the usual reason this would happen.
A lot of pressure was brought to bear on any scientist with a critical paper. Andrew Bryant at Cochrane Review was pushed to soften his take on ivermectin from "moderate evidence" to "no evidence" despite the clear evidence of efficacy.
One paper after another finding vaccine harms are retracted, for no reason or in the case of the Japanese study that found higher cancer rates, because "the data used could not prove the claim"*.
There's no explanation I can find of WHY the data "cannot be used".
I see this so often it doesn't even register anymore. Dozens of perfectly good papers are Retracted for NO good reason. The editor gets a call and that's that.
*Their data came from:
[
Materials And Methods
Statistical data
The data used in this analysis are all publicly available national data. Death figures were obtained from the Vital Statistics [14], which include monthly and annual deaths by cause, sex, and age (five-year age groups). Cancer deaths are divided into 20 subclassifications. Only Japanese individuals living in Japan are included. Population estimates by age group required for the age-adjusted analysis were also obtained from the national data [15]. The number of people with confirmed COVID-19 infection was obtained from the
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare website [16]. Vaccination rates by age group were obtained from the websites of the Prime Minister's Office and the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
I totally agree with the speaker they forced this on pregnant women and many lives were lost. I'm glad they are bringing the truth forward.
I refused the jab and knowing I would be thrown out of work, a board member of a major and now notorious hospital invited me to their house for coffee, hoping to convince me to agree to the jab. This board member exhorted that it was incredibly safe and that even their adult daughter and daughter in law had gotten the COVID jabs while pregnant, at their urging.
The board member grew quite frustrated that I couldn't be convinced. I never heard how it went for the daughters. I did know couples who were jabbed who successfully conceived and brought babies into the world. One colleague proudly told me they had gotten their 6 mo old son the COVID injections. I wondered, if a baby in the womb is already born with spike protein in their system, what sense does it make to inject a baby with more mRNA to incite even more spike production? How is it that infants aren't dying left and right? And how will the generation of COVID jabbed babies fare in life as they get older?
In my own experience, a young couple I know got married and got the shots in the same year, the next year their baby daughter was born with half an arm missing and no legs. The doctors are baffled because she has no genetic defect, the usual reason this would happen.
The authors of the paper that claimed 82% recanted in 2022- it was actually 9%
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8894688/
A lot of pressure was brought to bear on any scientist with a critical paper. Andrew Bryant at Cochrane Review was pushed to soften his take on ivermectin from "moderate evidence" to "no evidence" despite the clear evidence of efficacy.
One paper after another finding vaccine harms are retracted, for no reason or in the case of the Japanese study that found higher cancer rates, because "the data used could not prove the claim"*.
There's no explanation I can find of WHY the data "cannot be used".
I see this so often it doesn't even register anymore. Dozens of perfectly good papers are Retracted for NO good reason. The editor gets a call and that's that.
*Their data came from:
[
Materials And Methods
Statistical data
The data used in this analysis are all publicly available national data. Death figures were obtained from the Vital Statistics [14], which include monthly and annual deaths by cause, sex, and age (five-year age groups). Cancer deaths are divided into 20 subclassifications. Only Japanese individuals living in Japan are included. Population estimates by age group required for the age-adjusted analysis were also obtained from the national data [15]. The number of people with confirmed COVID-19 infection was obtained from the
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare website [16]. Vaccination rates by age group were obtained from the websites of the Prime Minister's Office and the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
]
https://assets.cureus.com/uploads/original_article/pdf/196275/20240626-11270-1tdj16b.pdf
Thank you for letting us know.
I read that inthe clinical trials, 100% of pregnancies were aborted by the MRNA vaxx jab.